中文版 | English
Title

RNA修饰酶高通量筛选方法的建立及NSUN6的鉴定与功能研究

Alternative Title
ESTABLISHMENT OF A HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING METHOD FOR RNA-MODIFYING ENZYMES AND IDENTIFICATION AND FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF NSUN6
Author
Name pinyin
WANG Wen
School number
11749266
Degree
博士
Discipline
0710 生物学
Subject category of dissertation
07 理学
Supervisor
陈炜
Mentor unit
生命科学学院
Publication Years
2022-10-26
Submission date
2023-03-27
University
哈尔滨工业大学
Place of Publication
哈尔滨
Abstract

DNARNA和蛋白质是中心法则的基本要素,遗传信息在此之间流动。而RNA作为中心法则的重要枢纽,发挥着承上启下的作用。相比DNA和蛋白质,RNA修饰的种类最为丰富。然而,大多数RNA修饰的研究仅在rRNAtRNA上,而许多mRNA修饰酶仍未被发现。传统寻找mRNA修饰酶的方法一种是通过分离细胞的不同组分与底物反应,进行酶活检测和质谱分析,这种方法的缺点是在体外进行,繁琐且灵敏度低;另一种则是通过生物信息学结构域比对的方法,这种方法的缺点是只能找到已有结构域的基因。因此,发展一项无偏好且高通量的筛选方法有待解决。随着CRISPR技术发展,研究者可以利用文库筛选技术寻找感兴趣的靶基因。然而,文库筛选的读出信息往往使用的是细胞殖速率的不同或者荧光信号的变化,而直接读出信息为RNA修饰还从未被探究过。本研究将sgRNA信息和RNA修饰报告基因偶联,建立了RNA修饰酶的高通量筛选方法,鉴定了新的mRNA m5C甲基转移酶NSUN6;通过对NSUN6的敲除,鉴定了NSUN6介导的位点,并揭示了其一级序列和二级结构的序列特征;通过构建Nsun6的敲除小鼠,对其生理学功能进行了系统的分析,发现Nsun6在免疫反应中具有一定的作用。

首先,本研究将CROP-seq的载体改造设计,使得sgRNA信息和RNA修饰报告基因检测偶联;利用已知的m1A甲基转移酶TRMT6/61A修饰MALAT1m1A修饰位点作为方法的验证,成功建立将sgRNA信息和m1A修饰报告基因偶联信息共同读取的可行性;并利用已知的m5C甲基转移酶NSUN2修饰的NIBIAN2NDUFB7m5C位点作为验证性实验,证明了通过重亚硫酸盐处理之后,能将sgRNA信息与m5C报告基因偶联信息的可行性;针对m5C位点分析发现,存在许多非NSUN2介导的m5C修饰位点,将这些位点上下游序列克隆至本研究设计的载体上,发现这些位点仍然能够被修饰且不受到NSUN2的调控,暗示着除了唯一报道的mRNA m5C甲基转移酶NSUN2之外,还存在其他未知的修饰酶。由于该方法是基于整合gRNA和报告基因的测序技术,本研究将此方法命名为CRISPR integrated gRNA and reporter sequencingCIGAR-seq)。

其次,通过CIGAR-seq高通量文库筛选技术,本研究使用829RNA结合蛋白对未知的mRNA甲基转移酶进行了筛选,鉴定了全新的mRNA m5C转移酶NSUN6;通过对NSUN6的敲除,鉴定了所有NSUN6介导的m5C修饰位点,这些位点和NSUN2介导的位点构成体内所有mRNA m5C修饰位点;对NSUN6介导的m5C修饰位点序列特征进行分析,发现在一级序列上,NSUN6修饰的m5C存在明显的m5CTCCA的模体;在二级结构上,m5C修饰的位点倾向于分布在环区;但令人意外地是,NSUN6介导的m5C修饰位点对其所在的mRNA的稳定性、定位和翻译没有影响。在筛选结果中和NSUN6蛋白免疫沉淀组学实验中,都未发现明显的NSUN6辅助因子,说明NSUN6介导的m5C位点的修饰仅需要NSUN6本身实现。

最后,为了研究Nsun6的生理学功能,本研究首次构建Nsun6敲除小鼠,发现Nsun6敲除小鼠仍可以正常发育,并且纯合交配也能够生出正常的后代,这暗示着Nsun6存在着更为精细的调控方式。然后,通过对于野生型和Nsun6敲除小鼠组织的重亚硫酸盐测序,本研究总共在小肠、肝脏、脾脏、肾脏和心脏五种组织中鉴定了609个高置信度的m5C甲基化位点,其中80个是Nsun6修饰的。通过对于上述5种组织进行mRNA-seq测序,可以发现相较于其他组织,Nsun6脾脏具有一定的影响。此外,在针对于脾脏的深入研究中发现,在T细胞依赖的免疫反应中,在Nsun6敲除小鼠中,浆细胞的数量和抗体的分泌显著下降。通过结合mRNA-seqmRNA重亚硫酸盐测序,发现Nsun6介导的m5C位点并不影响mRNA的稳定性,所以它对于免疫反应的影响是通过它的其他功能决定的。

综上,本研究主要通过建立一项高通量筛选RNA修饰酶的技术,鉴定了一个新的mRNA甲基转移酶NSUN6,并对NSUN6的分子和生理学功能进行了系统性探索,为mRNA修饰的研究提供了新的方法和基础。

Other Abstract

DNA, RNA, and proteins are the basic elements of the central dogma, among which genetic information flows. As a hub of the central dogma, RNA plays a linking role. Compared with DNA and proteins, RNA modifications are the most abundant. However, most studies on RNA modification are limited to rRNA and tRNA, and many mRNA methyltransferases and demethylases remain undiscovered. One of the traditional methods for finding methyltransferases is to separate different components of cells and perform mass spectrometry analysis on the components that react with the substrates. The disadvantage of this method is that it is carried out in vitro, and the detection of few RNAmodified sites is not sensitive. The other method is bioinformatics prediction, the disadvantage of this method is that only genes with existing domains can be found. The high-throughput screening for these enzymes remains to be resolved. With the development of CRISPR technology, researchers can use library screening technology to search for target genes with high-throughput. However, library screening readouts are using by selective proliferation or death of cells and fluorescent reporter systems to indirectly read out the information of interest, while direct readouts for RNA modifications have never been reported. This study established a high-throughput screening method for the trans-factors of RNA modification, and identified a novel mRNA m5C methyltransferase NSUN6. Through the knockout of NSUN6, the sequence characteristics of NSUN6-dependent sites were confirmed in vivo, and explored molecular metabolism of mRNAs with NSUN6-dependent sites. Finally, by constructing Nsun6 knockout mice, its physiological functions were systematically analyzed. The CROP-seq vector was redesigned to replace the WPRE region with an RNAmodified reporter, and the endogenous sites of m1A and m5C were used to successfully clone an exogenous reporter gene that could also be modified; using the known m1A methyltranseferase and its substrate that one site in MALAT1 was used as a positive experiment, which successfully verified the feasibility of reading the sgRNA information and the m1A modification reporter gene coupling information together; and the known m5C methyltransferase NSUN2 and m5C sites of NIBIAN2 and NDUFB7 were used as positive experiments to prove the feasibility of coupling sgRNA information with m5C reporter gene information after bisulfite treatment; and found there are some NSUN2 independent m5C sites. It was found that these sites could still be modified and were not regulated by NSUN2, Since this method is based on the sequencing technology of CRISPR integrated gRNA and reporter gene, this study named it CRISPR integrated gRNA and reporter sequencing (CIGAR-seq). This study also designed a protocol for the type of RNA modification detected by immunoprecipitation for subsequent promotion. Through the high-throughput library screening technology of CIGAR-seq, this study used 829 RNA-binding proteins to screen unknown mRNA methyltransferases, and identified a novel mRNA m5C methyltransferase NSUN6; All NSUN6-dependent m5C modification sites were identified, which constitute all mRNA m5C sites with NSUN2- dependent sites; then the sequence characteristics of NSUN6-mediated m5C modification sites were analyzed, and it was found that in the primary sequence, the NSUN6-dependent sites represent motifs with obvious m5CTCCA, while in the secondary structure, they tend to be in the loop region; then the NSUN6-mediated m5C sites are explored for the mRNA molecules where they are located. Surprisingly, the NSUN6-mediated m5C modification site has no effect on the stability, localization and translation of the mRNA in which it is located, suggesting that NSUN6-mediated m5C modification may only play a role under specific conditions. Finally, the cofactors of NSUN6 were not found. In the screening results and NSUN6 protein immunoprecipitation experiments, no obvious NSUN6 cofactors were found, indicating that the NSUN6-dependent m5C site modification may only be completed by NSUN6 itself. In order to study the physiological function of Nsun6, Nsun6 knockout mice were constructed for the first time, and it was revealed that Nsun6 knockout could still develop normally, and homozygous mating could also produce normal offspring, suggesting that Nsun6 may have a more elaborate regulation. Second, through simultaneous mRNA bisulfite sequencing of wild-type and Nsun6 knockout mice, this study identified a total of 609 high-confidence m5C sites in small intestine, liver, spleen, kidney, and heart, of which are Nsun6-dependent. Through mRNA-seq of the above five tissues, it can be found that the effect of Nsun6 on the small intestine, kidney and heart is weak, while the liver and spleen have a certain effect. In addition, in an in-depth study on the spleen, for the T cell-dependent immune responses, although Nsun6 does not affect the proportion and number of germinal center B cells, it has an effect on the number of plasma cells and the secretion of antibodies. Finally, by combining mRNA-seq and mRNA bisulfite sequencing, it is suggested that Nsun6-dependent m5C sites do not affect mRNA stability, so its effect in vivo is likely to be determined by its other functions. In summary, this study identified a novel mRNA methyltransferase NSUN6 by establishing a high-throughput screening technology, and systematically explored the molecular and physiological functions of NSUN6, providing more insights into NSUN6.

Keywords
Other Keyword
Language
Chinese
Training classes
联合培养
Enrollment Year
2017
Year of Degree Awarded
2022
References List

[1] BOCCALETTO P, STEFANIAK F, RAY A, et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2021 update[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2022, 50(D1): D231-D235.
[2] NACHTERGAELE S, HE C. Erratum: Publisher's Note[J]. RNA Biology, 2017, 14(9): 1269.
[3] JIA G, FU Y, ZHAO X, et al. N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2011, 7(12): 885-887.
[4] XIAO W, ADHIKARI S, DAHAL U, et al. Nuclear m(6)A reader YTHDC1 regulates mRNA splicing[J]. Molecular Cell, 2016, 61(4): 507-519.
[5] HSU P J, ZHU Y, MA H, et al. Ythdc2 is an N(6)-methyladenosine binding protein that regulates mammalian spermatogenesis[J]. Cell Research, 2017, 27(9): 1115-1127.
[6] XU D, SHAO J, SONG H, et al. The YTH domain family of N6-methyladenosine "Readers" in the diagnosis and prognosis of colonic adenocarcinoma[J]. Biomedical Research International, 2020, 2020: 9502560.
[7] HUANG H, WENG H, SUN W, et al. Recognition of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation[J]. Nature Cell Biology, 2018, 20(3): 285-295.
[8] MEYER K D, PATIL D P, ZHOU J, et al. 5' UTR m(6)A promotes cap-independent translation[J]. Cell, 2015, 163(4): 999-1010.
[9] YANG X, YANG Y, SUN B F, et al. 5-methylcytosine promotes mRNA export - NSUN2 as the methyltransferase and ALYREF as an m(5)C reader[J]. Cell Research, 2017, 27(5): 606-625.
[10] CHEN X, LI A, SUN B F, et al. 5-methylcytosine promotes pathogenesis of bladder cancer through stabilizing mRNAs[J]. Nature Cell Biology, 2019, 21(8): 978-990.
[11] YANG Y, WANG L, HAN X, et al. RNA 5-Methylcytosine facilitates the maternal-to-zygotic transition by preventing maternal mRNA decay[J]. Molecular Cell, 2019, 75(6): 1188-1202 e1111.
[12] AGUILO F, ZHANG F, SANCHO A, et al. Coordination of m(6)A mRNA methylation and gene transcription by ZFP217 regulates pluripotency and reprogramming[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2015, 17(6): 689-704.
[13] CHEN T, HAO Y J, ZHANG Y, et al. m(6)A RNA methylation is regulated by microRNAs and promotes reprogramming to pluripotency[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2015, 16(3): 289-301.
[14] GEULA S, MOSHITCH-MOSHKOVITZ S, DOMINISSINI D, et al. Stem cells. m6A mRNA methylation facilitates resolution of naive pluripotency toward differentiation[J]. Science, 2015, 347(6225): 1002-1006.
[15] CUI Q, SHI H, YE P, et al. m(6)A RNA Methylation regulates the self-renewal and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma stem cells[J]. Cell Reports, 2017, 18(11): 2622-2634.
[16] LI H B, TONG J, ZHU S, et al. m(6)A mRNA methylation controls T cell homeostasis by targeting the IL-7/STAT5/SOCS pathways[J]. Nature, 2017, 548(7667): 338-342.
[17] LI Z, WENG H, SU R, et al. FTO plays an oncogenic role in acute myeloid leukemia as a N(6)-methyladenosine RNA demethylase[J]. Cancer Cell, 2017, 31(1): 127-141.
[18] XU K, YANG Y, FENG G, et al. Mettl3-mediated mA regulates spermatogonial differentiation and meiosis initiation[J]. Cell Research, 2017, 27(9): 1100-1114.
[19] ZHANG C, CHEN Y, SUN B, et al. m(6)A modulates haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell specification[J]. Nature, 2017, 549(7671): 273-276.
[20] LEWIS C J, PAN T, KALSOTRA A. RNA modifications and structures cooperate to guide RNA-protein interactions[J]. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2017, 18(3): 202-210.
[21] BOKAR J A, RATH-SHAMBAUGH M E, LUDWICZAK R, et al. Characterization and partial purification of mRNA N6-adenosine methyltransferase from HeLa cell nuclei. Internal mRNA methylation requires a multisubunit complex[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1994, 269(26): 17697-17704.
[22] BOKAR J A, SHAMBAUGH M E, POLAYES D, et al. Purification and cDNA cloning of the AdoMet-binding subunit of the human mRNA (N6-adenosine)-methyltransferase[J]. RNA, 1997, 3(11): 1233-1247.
[23] WANG Y, LI Y, TOTH J I, et al. N6-methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells[J]. Nature Cell Biology, 2014, 16(2): 191-198.
[24] AKICHIKA S, HIRANO S, SHICHINO Y, et al. Cap-specific terminal N (6)-methylation of RNA by an RNA polymerase II-associated methyltransferase[J]. Science, 2019, 363(6423).
[25] BOULIAS K, TOCZYDLOWSKA-SOCHA D, HAWLEY B R, et al. Identification of the m(6)Am methyltransferase PCIF1 reveals the location and functions of m(6)Am in the transcriptome[J]. Molecular Cell, 2019, 75(3): 631-643 e638.
[26] JOUNG J, KONERMANN S, GOOTENBERG J S, et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening[J]. Nature Protocol, 2017, 12(4): 828-863.
[27] ZHOU Y, ZHU S, CAI C, et al. High-throughput screening of a CRISPR/Cas9 library for functional genomics in human cells[J]. Nature, 2014, 509(7501): 487-491.
[28] KODAMA M, KODAMA T, NEWBERG J Y, et al. In vivo loss-of-function screens identify KPNB1 as a new druggable oncogene in epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 2017, 114(35): E7301-E7310.
[29] HENRIKSSON J, CHEN X, GOMES T, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens in T helper cells reveal pervasive crosstalk between activation and differentiation[J]. Cell, 2019, 176(4): 882-896 e818.
[30] SHIFRUT E, CARNEVALE J, TOBIN V, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens in primary human T cells reveal key regulators of immune function[J]. Cell, 2018, 175(7): 1958-1971 e1915.
[31] TAOKA M, NOBE Y, YAMAKI Y, et al. Landscape of the complete RNA chemical modifications in the human 80S ribosome[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2018, 46(18): 9289-9298.
[32] LORENZ C, LUNSE C E, MORL M. tRNA Modifications: impact on structure and thermal adaptation[J]. Biomolecules, 2017, 7(2).
[33] DESROSIERS R, FRIDERICI K, ROTTMAN F. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger-RNA from novikoff hepatoma-cells[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1974, 71(10): 3971-3975.
[34] PERRY R P, KELLEY D E, FRIDERICI K, et al. The methylated constituents of L cell messenger RNA: evidence for an unusual cluster at the 5' terminus[J]. Cell, 1975, 4(4): 387-394.
[35] LI X, XIONG X, WANG K, et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals reversible and dynamic N(1)-methyladenosine methylome[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2016, 12(5): 311-316.
[36] DOMINISSINI D, NACHTERGAELE S, MOSHITCH-MOSHKOVITZ S, et al. The dynamic N(1)-methyladenosine methylome in eukaryotic messenger RNA[J]. Nature, 2016, 530(7591): 441-446.
[37] MORSE D P, BASS B L. Detection of inosine in messenger RNA by inosine-specific cleavage[J]. Biochemistry, 1997, 36(28): 8429-8434.
[38] CARLILE T M, ROJAS-DURAN M F, ZINSHTEYN B, et al. Pseudouridine profiling reveals regulated mRNA pseudouridylation in yeast and human cells[J]. Nature, 2014, 515(7525): 143-146.
[39] LOVEJOY A F, RIORDAN D P, BROWN P O. Transcriptome-wide mapping of pseudouridines: pseudouridine synthases modify specific mRNAs in S. cerevisiae[J]. Plos One, 2014, 9(10): e110799.
[40] SCHWARTZ S, BERNSTEIN D A, MUMBACH M R, et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals widespread dynamic-regulated pseudouridylation of ncRNA and mRNA[J]. Cell, 2014, 159(1): 148-162.
[41] DUBIN D T, TAYLOR R H. The methylation state of poly A-containing messenger RNA from cultured hamster cells[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1975, 2(10): 1653-1668.
[42] SOMMER S, SALDITT-GEORGIEFF M, BACHENHEIMER S, et al. The methylation of adenovirus-specific nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1976, 3(3): 749-765.
[43] HUBER S M, VAN DELFT P, MENDIL L, et al. Formation and abundance of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in RNA[J]. Chembiochem, 2015, 16(5): 752-755.
[44] DELATTE B, WANG F, NGOC L V, et al. RNA biochemistry. Transcriptome-wide distribution and function of RNA hydroxymethylcytosine[J]. Science, 2016, 351(6270): 282-285.
[45] KARIJOLICH J, YU Y T. Converting nonsense codons into sense codons by targeted pseudouridylation[J]. Nature, 2011, 474(7351): 395-398.
[46] FERNANDEZ I S, NG C L, KELLEY A C, et al. Unusual base pairing during the decoding of a stop codon by the ribosome[J]. Nature, 2013, 500(7460): 107-110.
[47] HARCOURT E M, KIETRYS A M, KOOL E T. Chemical and structural effects of base modifications in messenger RNA[J]. Nature, 2017, 541(7637): 339-346.
[48] MEYER K D, SALETORE Y, ZUMBO P, et al. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3' UTRs and near stop codons[J]. Cell, 2012, 149(7): 1635-1646.
[49] DOMINISSINI D, MOSHITCH-MOSHKOVITZ S, SCHWARTZ S, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq[J]. Nature, 2012, 485(7397): 201-206.
[50] SQUIRES J E, PATEL H R, NOUSCH M, et al. Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and non-coding RNA[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, 40(11): 5023-5033.
[51] KHODDAMI V, CAIRNS B R. Identification of direct targets and modified bases of RNA cytosine methyltransferases[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31(5): 458-464.

[52] SAKURAI M, YANO T, KAWABATA H, et al. Inosine cyanoethylation identifies A-to-I RNA editing sites in the human transcriptome[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2010, 6(10): 733-740.

[53] RAMASWAMI G, ZHANG R, PISKOL R, et al. Identifying RNA editing sites using RNA sequencing data alone[J]. Nature Methods, 2013, 10(2): 128-132.

[54] GARCIA-CAMPOS M A, EDELHEIT S, TOTH U, et al. Deciphering the "m(6)A Code" via antibody-independent quantitative profiling[J]. Cell, 2019, 178(3): 731-747 e716.

[55] MEYER K D. DART-seq: an antibody-free method for global m(6)A detection[J]. Nature Methods, 2019, 16(12): 1275-1280.

[56] ZHANG Z, CHEN L Q, ZHAO Y L, et al. Single-base mapping of m(6)A by an antibody-independent method[J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(7): eaax0250.

[57] LINDER B, GROZHIK A V, OLARERIN-GEORGE A O, et al. Single-nucleotide-resolution mapping of m6A and m6Am throughout the transcriptome[J]. Nature Methods, 2015, 12(8): 767-772.

[58] HAUSSMANN I U, BODI Z, SANCHEZ-MORAN E, et al. m(6)A potentiates Sxl alternative pre-mRNA splicing for robust Drosophila sex determination[J]. Nature, 2016, 540(7632): 301-304.

[59] LENCE T, AKHTAR J, BAYER M, et al. m(6)A modulates neuronal functions and sex determination in Drosophila[J]. Nature, 2016, 540(7632): 242-247.

[60] KNUCKLES P, LENCE T, HAUSSMANN I U, et al. Zc3h13/Flacc is required for adenosine methylation by bridging the mRNA-binding factor Rbm15/Spenito to the m(6)A machinery component Wtap/Fl(2)d[J]. Genes and Development, 2018, 32(5-6): 415-429.

[61] ZHAO X, YANG Y, SUN B F, et al. FTO-dependent demethylation of N6-methyladenosine regulates mRNA splicing and is required for adipogenesis[J]. Cell Research, 2014, 24(12): 1403-1419.

[62] ZHENG G, DAHL J A, NIU Y, et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility[J]. Molecular Cell, 2013, 49(1): 18-29.

[63] TANG C, KLUKOVICH R, PENG H, et al. ALKBH5-dependent m6A demethylation controls splicing and stability of long 3'-UTR mRNAs in male germ cells[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 2018, 115(2): E325-E333.

[64] YANG X, YANG Y, SUN B F, et al. 5-methylcytosine promotes mRNA export-NSUN2 as the methyltransferase and ALYREF as an m(5)C reader[J]. Cell Research, 2017, 27(5): 606-625.

[65] SARAMAGO M, DA COSTA P J, VIEGAS S C, et al. The implication of mRNA degradation disorders on human DISease: focus on DIS3 and DIS3-Like Enzymes[J]. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2019, 1157: 85-98.

[66] SCHMID M, JENSEN T H. The nuclear RNA exosome and its cofactors[J]. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2019, 1203: 113-132.

[67] WOLIN S L, MAQUAT L E. Cellular RNA surveillance in health and disease[J]. Science, 2019, 366(6467): 822-827.

[68] WANG X, LU Z, GOMEZ A, et al. N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability[J]. Nature, 2014, 505(7481): 117-120.

[69] SHI H, WANG X, LU Z, et al. YTHDF3 facilitates translation and decay of N(6)-methyladenosine-modified RNA[J]. Cell Research, 2017, 27(3): 315-328.

[70] ZHANG X, LIU Z, YI J, et al. The tRNA methyltransferase NSun2 stabilizes p16INK(4) mRNA by methylating the 3'-untranslated region of p16[J]. Nature Communications, 2012, 3: 712.

[71] ANISIMOVA A, AKULICH K, ABAKUMOVA T, et al. mRNA 5 ' UTR modulates positive effect of incorporated m5C and N1 m Psi nucleotides on mRNA expression[J]. Febs Open Bio, 2018, 8: 124-125.

[72] YANG Y, WANG L, HAN X, et al. RNA 5-Methylcytosine facilitates the maternal-to-zygotic transition by preventing maternal mRNA decay[J]. Molecular Cell, 2019.

[73] NAKAMOTO M A, LOVEJOY A F, CYGAN A M, et al. mRNA pseudouridylation affects RNA metabolism in the parasite Toxoplasma gondii[J]. RNA, 2017, 23(12): 1834-1849.

[74] CHOI J, IEONG K W, DEMIRCI H, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine in mRNA disrupts tRNA selection and translation-elongation dynamics[J]. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2016, 23(2): 110-115.

[75] HOERNES T P, CLEMENTI N, FASERL K, et al. Nucleotide modifications within bacterial messenger RNAs regulate their translation and are able to rewire the genetic code[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2016, 44(2): 852-862.

[76] SCHUMANN U, ZHANG H N, SIBBRITT T, et al. Multiple links between 5-methylcytosine content of mRNA and translation[J]. BMC Biology, 2020, 18(1): 40.

[77] COOTS R A, LIU X M, MAO Y, et al. m(6)A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation[J]. Molecular Cell, 2017, 68(3): 504-514 e507.

[78] TANABE A, TANIKAWA K, TSUNETOMI M, et al. RNA helicase YTHDC2 promotes cancer metastasis via the enhancement of the efficiency by which HIF-1alpha mRNA is translated[J]. Cancer Letter, 2016, 376(1): 34-42.

[79] KUDLA G, LIPINSKI L, CAFFIN F, et al. High guanine and cytosine content increases mRNA levels in mammalian cells[J]. Plos Biology, 2006, 4(6): e180.

[80] LIMA S A, CHIPMAN L B, NICHOLSON A L, et al. Short poly(A) tails are a conserved feature of highly expressed genes[J]. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2017, 24(12): 1057-1063.

[81] LEPPEK K, DAS R, BARNA M. Author Correction: Functional 5' UTR mRNA structures in eukaryotic translation regulation and how to find them[J]. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2018, 19(10): 673.

[82] MU X, GREENWALD E, AHMAD S, et al. An origin of the immunogenicity of in vitro transcribed RNA[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2018, 46(10): 5239-5249.

[83] CHAUDHARY N, WEISSMAN D, WHITEHEAD K A. mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation[J]. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2021, 20(11): 817-838.

[84] KARIKO K, MURAMATSU H, WELSH F A, et al. Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability[J]. Molecular Therapy, 2008, 16(11): 1833-1840.

[85] VAIDYANATHAN S, AZIZIAN K T, HAQUE A, et al. Uridine depletion and chemical modification increase Cas9 mRNA activity and reduce immunogenicity without HPLC purification[J]. Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids, 2018, 12: 530-542.

[86] WANG X, FENG J, XUE Y, et al. Structural basis of N(6)-adenosine methylation by the METTL3-METTL14 complex[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7608): 575-578.

[87] PING X L, SUN B F, WANG L, et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase[J]. Cell Research, 2014, 24(2): 177-189.

[88] ZHONG S, LI H, BODI Z, et al. MTA is an Arabidopsis messenger RNA adenosine methylase and interacts with a homolog of a sex-specific splicing factor[J]. Plant Cell, 2008, 20(5): 1278-1288.

[89] BODI Z, ZHONG S, MEHRA S, et al. Adenosine methylation in arabidopsis mRNA is associated with the 3' end and reduced levels cause developmental defects[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2012, 3: 48.

[90] CLANCY M J, SHAMBAUGH M E, TIMPTE C S, et al. Induction of sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae leads to the formation of N6-methyladenosine in mRNA: a potential mechanism for the activity of the IME4 gene[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, 30(20): 4509-4518.

[91] BODI Z, BUTTON J D, GRIERSON D, et al. Yeast targets for mRNA methylation[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, 38(16): 5327-5335.

[92] LIANG X, ZHANG Z, WANG L, et al. Mechanism of methyltransferase like 3 in epithelial-mesenchymal transition process, invasion, and metastasis in esophageal cancer[J]. Bioengineered, 2021, 12(2): 10023-10036.

[93] ZHANG F, YAN Y, CAO X, et al. Methylation of microRNA-338-5p by EED promotes METTL3-mediated translation of oncogene CDCP1 in gastric cancer[J]. Aging (Albany NY), 2021, 13(8): 12224-12238.

[94] CUI X, WANG Z, LI J, et al. Cross talk between RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase-like 3 and miR-186 regulates hepatoblastoma progression through Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway[J]. Cell Proliferation, 2020, 53(3): e12768.

[95] CHEN X, XU M, XU X, et al. METTL14-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of SOX4 mRNA inhibits tumor metastasis in colorectal cancer[J]. Molecular Cancer, 2020, 19(1): 106.

[96] YANG X, ZHANG S, HE C, et al. METTL14 suppresses proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer by down-regulating oncogenic long non-coding RNA XIST[J]. Molecular Cancer, 2020, 19(1): 46.

[97] LIN Z, HSU P J, XING X, et al. Mettl3-/Mettl14-mediated mRNA N(6)-methyladenosine modulates murine spermatogenesis[J]. Cell Research, 2017, 27(10): 1216-1230.

[98] JIA G, YANG C G, YANG S, et al. Oxidative demethylation of 3-methylthymine and 3-methyluracil in single-stranded DNA and RNA by mouse and human FTO[J]. FEBS Letters, 2008, 582(23-24): 3313-3319.

[99] YUE C, CHEN J, LI Z, et al. microRNA-96 promotes occurrence and progression of colorectal cancer via regulation of the AMPKalpha2-FTO-m6A/MYC axis[J]. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, 2020, 39(1): 240.

[100] ELKASHEF S M, LIN A P, MYERS J, et al. IDH Mutation, Competitive inhibition of FTO, and RNA Methylation[J]. Cancer Cell, 2017, 31(5): 619-620.

[101] HUANG Y, SU R, SHENG Y, et al. Small-Molecule targeting of oncogenic FTO demethylase in acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Cancer Cell, 2019, 35(4): 677-691 e610.

[102] HEISSENBERGER C, ROLLINS J A, KRAMMER T L, et al. The ribosomal RNA m(5)C methyltransferase NSUN-1 modulates healthspan and oogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans[J]. Elife, 2020, 9.

[103] LIAO H, GAUR A, MCCONIE H, et al. hNOP2/NSUN1 Regulates ribosome biogenesis through stabilization of snoRNP complexes and cytosine-5 methylation of 28S rRNA[J]. bioRxiv, 2022: 2021.2011.2012.468419.

[104] METODIEV M D, SPAHR H, LOGUERCIO POLOSA P, et al. NSUN4 is a dual function mitochondrial protein required for both methylation of 12S rRNA and coordination of mitoribosomal assembly[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2014, 10(2): e1004110.

[105] BLANCO S, DIETMANN S, FLORES J V, et al. Aberrant methylation of tRNAs links cellular stress to neuro-developmental disorders[J]. EMBO Journal, 2014, 33(18): 2020-2039.

[106] FU L, GUERRERO C R, ZHONG N, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in RNA[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(33): 11582-11585.

[107] KAWARADA L, SUZUKI T, OHIRA T, et al. ALKBH1 is an RNA dioxygenase responsible for cytoplasmic and mitochondrial tRNA modifications[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2017, 45(12): 7401-7415.

[108] MACARI F, EL-HOUFI Y, BOLDINA G, et al. TRM6/61 connects PKCalpha with translational control through tRNAi(Met) stabilization: impact on tumorigenesis[J]. Oncogene, 2016, 35(14): 1785-1796.

[109] SAFRA M, SAS-CHEN A, NIR R, et al. The m1A landscape on cytosolic and mitochondrial mRNA at single-base resolution[J]. Nature, 2017, 551(7679): 251-255.

[110] ZHOU H, RAUCH S, DAI Q, et al. Evolution of a reverse transcriptase to map N(1)-methyladenosine in human messenger RNA[J]. Nature Methods, 2019, 16(12): 1281-1288.

[111] LIU F, CLARK W, LUO G, et al. ALKBH1-mediated tRNA demethylation regulates translation[J]. Cell, 2016, 167(7): 1897.

[112] CHEN Z, QI M, SHEN B, et al. Transfer RNA demethylase ALKBH3 promotes cancer progression via induction of tRNA-derived small RNAs[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2019, 47(5): 2533-2545.

[113] WOO H H, CHAMBERS S K. Human ALKBH3-induced m(1)A demethylation increases the CSF-1 mRNA stability in breast and ovarian cancer cells[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, 2019, 1862(1): 35-46.

[114] NAKAO S, MABUCHI M, SHIMIZU T, et al. Design and synthesis of prostate cancer antigen-1 (PCA-1/ALKBH3) inhibitors as anti-prostate cancer drugs[J]. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2014, 24(4): 1071-1074.

[115] BARBIERI I, KOUZARIDES T. Role of RNA modifications in cancer[J]. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2020, 20(6): 303-322.

[116] HONG B, BROCKENBROUGH J S, WU P, et al. Nop2p is required for pre-rRNA processing and 60S ribosome subunit synthesis in yeast[J]. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1997, 17(1): 378-388.

[117] WU P, BROCKENBROUGH J S, PADDY M R, et al. NCL1, a novel gene for a non-essential nuclear protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Gene, 1998, 220(1-2): 109-117.

[118] MOTORIN Y, GROSJEAN H. Multisite-specific tRNA:m5C-methyltransferase (Trm4) in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: identification of the gene and substrate specificity of the enzyme[J]. RNA, 1999, 5(8): 1105-1118.

[119] BRZEZICHA B, SCHMIDT M, MAKALOWSKA I, et al. Identification of human tRNA:m5C methyltransferase catalysing intron-dependent m5C formation in the first position of the anticodon of the pre-tRNA Leu (CAA)[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2006, 34(20): 6034-6043.

[120] FRYE M, WATT F M. The RNA methyltransferase Misu (NSun2) mediates Myc-induced proliferation and is upregulated in tumors[J]. Current Biology, 2006, 16(10): 971-981.

[121] BLANCO S, KUROWSKI A, NICHOLS J, et al. The RNA-methyltransferase Misu (NSun2) poises epidermal stem cells to differentiate[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2011, 7(12): e1002403.

[122] HUSSAIN S, TUORTO F, MENON S, et al. The mouse cytosine-5 RNA methyltransferase NSun2 is a component of the chromatoid body and required for testis differentiation[J]. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2013, 33(8): 1561-1570.

[123] BLANCO S, BANDIERA R, POPIS M, et al. Stem cell function and stress response are controlled by protein synthesis[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7607): 335-340.

[124] ABBASI-MOHEB L, MERTEL S, GONSIOR M, et al. Mutations in NSUN2 cause autosomal-recessive intellectual disability[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2012, 90(5): 847-855.

[125] KHAN M A, RAFIQ M A, NOOR A, et al. Mutation in NSUN2, which encodes an RNA methyltransferase, causes autosomal-recessive intellectual disability[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2012, 90(5): 856-863.

[126] MARTINEZ F J, LEE J H, LEE J E, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies a splicing mutation in NSUN2 as a cause of a Dubowitz-like syndrome[J]. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2012, 49(6): 380-385.

[127] HAAG S, SLOAN K E, RANJAN N, et al. NSUN3 and ABH1 modify the wobble position of mt-tRNAMet to expand codon recognition in mitochondrial translation[J]. EMBO Journal, 2016, 35(19): 2104-2119.

[128] NAKANO S, SUZUKI T, KAWARADA L, et al. NSUN3 methylase initiates 5-formylcytidine biogenesis in human mitochondrial tRNA(Met)[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2016, 12(7): 546-551.

[129] VAN HAUTE L, DIETMANN S, KREMER L, et al. Deficient methylation and formylation of mt-tRNA(Met) wobble cytosine in a patient carrying mutations in NSUN3[J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7: 12039.

[130] GOLL M G, KIRPEKAR F, MAGGERT K A, et al. Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2[J]. Science, 2006, 311(5759): 395-398.

[131] HAAG S, WARDA A S, KRETSCHMER J, et al. NSUN6 is a human RNA methyltransferase that catalyzes formation of m5C72 in specific tRNAs[J]. RNA, 2015, 21(9): 1532-1543.

[132] LI J, LI H, LONG T, et al. Archaeal NSUN6 catalyzes m5C72 modification on a wide-range of specific tRNAs[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2019, 47(4): 2041-2055.

[133] LI C, WANG S, XING Z, et al. A ROR1-HER3-lncRNA signalling axis modulates the Hippo-YAP pathway to regulate bone metastasis[J]. Nature Cell Biology, 2017, 19(2): 106-119.

[134] YANG R, LIANG X, WANG H, et al. The RNA methyltransferase NSUN6 suppresses pancreatic cancer development by regulating cell proliferation[J]. Ebiomedicine, 2021, 63: 103195.

[135] ISHINO Y, SHINAGAWA H, MAKINO K, et al. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1987, 169(12): 5429-5433.

[136] MOJICA F J, DIEZ-VILLASENOR C, GARCIA-MARTINEZ J, et al. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements[J]. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 2005, 60(2): 174-182.

[137] BOLOTIN A, QUINQUIS B, SOROKIN A, et al. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin[J]. Microbiology (Reading), 2005, 151(Pt 8): 2551-2561.

[138] POURCEL C, SALVIGNOL G, VERGNAUD G. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies[J]. Microbiology (Reading), 2005, 151(Pt 3): 653-663.

[139] MAKAROVA K S, ARAVIND L, GRISHIN N V, et al. A DNA repair system specific for thermophilic Archaea and bacteria predicted by genomic context analysis[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, 30(2): 482-496.

[140] JANSEN R, EMBDEN J D, GAASTRA W, et al. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes[J]. Molecular Microbiology, 2002, 43(6): 1565-1575.

[141] BARRANGOU R, FREMAUX C, DEVEAU H, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes[J]. Science, 2007, 315(5819): 1709-1712.

[142] CONG L, RAN F A, COX D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 819-823.

[143] JINEK M, CHYLINSKI K, FONFARA I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity[J]. Science, 2012, 337(6096): 816-821.

[144] WANG J Y, PAUSCH P, DOUDNA J A. Structural biology of CRISPR-Cas immunity and genome editing enzymes[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2022, 20(11): 641-656.

[145] KOIKE-YUSA H, LI Y, TAN E P, et al. Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32(3): 267-273.

[146] SHALEM O, SANJANA N E, HARTENIAN E, et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells[J]. Science, 2014, 343(6166): 84-87.

[147] WANG T, WEI J J, SABATINI D M, et al. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system[J]. Science, 2014, 343(6166): 80-84.

[148] LARSON M H, GILBERT L A, WANG X, et al. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression[J]. Nature Protocol, 2013, 8(11): 2180-2196.

[149] KONERMANN S, BRIGHAM M D, TREVINO A E, et al. Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex[J]. Nature, 2015, 517(7536): 583-588.

[150] BOCK C, DATLINGER P, CHARDON F, et al. High-content CRISPR screening[J]. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2022, 2(1).

[151] WAN C, MAHARA S, SUN C, et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 screen of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling identifies therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer[J]. Science Advances, 2021, 7(21).

[152] DONG M B, WANG G, CHOW R D, et al. Systematic immunotherapy target discovery using genome-scale in vivo CRISPR screens in CD8 T cells[J]. Cell, 2019, 178(5): 1189-1204 e1123.

[153] GURUSAMY D, HENNING A N, YAMAMOTO T N, et al. Multi-phenotype CRISPR-Cas9 screen identifies p38 kinase as a target for adoptive immunotherapies[J]. Cancer Cell, 2020, 37(6): 818-833 e819.

[154] SHANG W, JIANG Y, BOETTCHER M, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies FAM49B as a key regulator of actin dynamics and T cell activation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 2018, 115(17): E4051-E4060.

[155] HENRIKSSON J, CHEN X, GOMES T, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens in T helper cells Reveal Pervasive Crosstalk between Activation and Differentiation[J]. Cell, 2019, 176(4): 882-896.

[156] LAFLEUR M W, NGUYEN T H, COXE M A, et al. PTPN2 regulates the generation of exhausted CD8(+) T cell subpopulations and restrains tumor immunity[J]. Nature Immunology, 2019, 20(10): 1335-1347.

[157] CHEN Z, ARAI E, KHAN O, et al. In vivo CD8(+) T cell CRISPR screening reveals control by Fli1 in infection and cancer[J]. Cell, 2021, 184(5): 1262-1280 e1222.

[158] WHEELER E C, VU A Q, EINSTEIN J M, et al. Pooled CRISPR screens with imaging on microraft arrays reveals stress granule-regulatory factors[J]. Nature Methods, 2020, 17(6): 636-642.

[159] LIN S, SCHORPP K, ROTHENAIGNER I, et al. Image-based high-content screening in drug discovery[J]. Drug Discovery Today, 2020, 25(8): 1348-1361.

[160] HASLE N, COOKE A, SRIVATSAN S, et al. High-throughput, microscope-based sorting to dissect cellular heterogeneity[J]. Molecular Systems Biology, 2020, 16(6): e9442.

[161] KANFER G, SARRAF S A, MAMAN Y, et al. Image-based pooled whole-genome CRISPRi screening for subcellular phenotypes[J]. Journal of Cell Biology, 2021, 220(2).

[162] YAN X, STUURMAN N, RIBEIRO S A, et al. High-content imaging-based pooled CRISPR screens in mammalian cells[J]. Journal of Cell Biology, 2021, 220(2).

[163] ADAMSON B, NORMAN T M, JOST M, et al. A multiplexed single-cell CRISPR screening platform enables systematic dissection of the unfolded protein response[J]. Cell, 2016, 167(7): 1867-1882 e1821.

[164] DIXIT A, PARNAS O, LI B, et al. Perturb-Seq: Dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-Cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens[J]. Cell, 2016, 167(7): 1853-1866 e1817.

[165] JAITIN D A, WEINER A, YOFE I, et al. Dissecting immune circuits by linking CRISPR-pooled screens with single-cell RNA-Seq[J]. Cell, 2016, 167(7): 1883-1896 e1815.

[166] DATLINGER P, RENDEIRO A F, SCHMIDL C, et al. Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout[J]. Nature Methods, 2017, 14(3): 297-301.

[167] XIE S, DUAN J, LI B, et al. Multiplexed engineering and analysis of combinatorial enhancer activity in single cells[J]. Molecular Cell, 2017, 66(2): 285-299 e285.

[168] JIN X, SIMMONS S K, GUO A, et al. In vivo Perturb-Seq reveals neuronal and glial abnormalities associated with autism risk genes[J]. Science, 2020, 370(6520): 1057-+.

[169] HILL A J, MCFALINE-FIGUEROA J L, STARITA L M, et al. On the design of CRISPR-based single-cell molecular screens[J]. Nature Methods, 2018, 15(4): 271-274.

[170] REPLOGLE J M, NORMAN T M, XU A, et al. Combinatorial single-cell CRISPR screens by direct guide RNA capture and targeted sequencing[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2020, 38(8): 954-961.

[171] MIMITOU E P, CHENG A, MONTALBANO A, et al. Multiplexed detection of proteins, transcriptomes, clonotypes and CRISPR perturbations in single cells[J]. Nature Methods, 2019, 16(5): 409-412.

[172] BOLGER A M, LOHSE M, USADEL B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data[J]. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(15): 2114-2120.

[173] KIM D, PAGGI J M, PARK C, et al. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(8): 907-915.

[174] LIAO Y, SMYTH G K, SHI W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features[J]. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(7): 923-930.

[175] CHEN S, ZHOU Y, CHEN Y, et al. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor[J]. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34(17): i884-i890.

[176] LANGMEAD B, SALZBERG S L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2[J]. Nature Methods, 2012, 9(4): 357-359.

[177] WAGIH O. ggseqlogo: a versatile R package for drawing sequence logos[J]. Bioinformatics, 2017, 33(22): 3645-3647.

[178] HUANG T, CHEN W, LIU J, et al. Genome-wide identification of mRNA 5-methylcytosine in mammals[J]. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2019, 26(5): 380-388.

[179] BATISTA P J, MOLINIE B, WANG J, et al. m(6)A RNA modification controls cell fate transition in mammalian embryonic stem cells[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2014, 15(6): 707-719.

[180] GUO Y, YU H, SAMUELS D C, et al. Single-nucleotide variants in human RNA: RNA editing and beyond[J]. Briefings in Functional Genomics, 2019, 18(1): 30-39.

[181] MERKLE T, MERZ S, REAUTSCHNIG P, et al. Precise RNA editing by recruiting endogenous ADARs with antisense oligonucleotides[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(2): 133-138.

[182] MALI P, YANG L, ESVELT K M, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 823-826.

[183] EVERS B, JASTRZEBSKI K, HEIJMANS J P, et al. CRISPR knockout screening outperforms shRNA and CRISPRi in identifying essential genes[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2016, 34(6): 631-633.

[184] JUSZKIEWICZ S, HEGDE R S. Initiation of Quality Control during Poly(A) Translation Requires Site-Specific Ribosome Ubiquitination[J]. Molecular Cell, 2017, 65(4): 743-750 e744.

[185] HELM M. Post-transcriptional nucleotide modification and alternative folding of RNA[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2006, 34(2): 721-733.

[186] AGRIS P F. Bringing order to translation: the contributions of transfer RNA anticodon-domain modifications[J]. EMBO Reports, 2008, 9(7): 629-635.

[187] SCHAEFER M, POLLEX T, HANNA K, et al. RNA cytosine methylation analysis by bisulfite sequencing[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2009, 37(2): e12.

[188] LI X, XIONG X, ZHANG M, et al. Base-Resolution Mapping Reveals Distinct m(1)A Methylome in Nuclear- and Mitochondrial-Encoded Transcripts[J]. Molecular Cell, 2017, 68(5): 993-1005 e1009.

[189] FRYE M, HARADA B T, BEHM M, et al. RNA modifications modulate gene expression during development[J]. Science, 2018, 361(6409): 1346-1349.

[190] BOHNSACK K E, HOBARTNER C, BOHNSACK M T. Eukaryotic 5-methylcytosine (m(5)C) RNA Methyltransferases: Mechanisms, Cellular Functions, and Links to Disease[J]. Genes (Basel), 2019, 10(2).

[191] GAO Y, FANG J. RNA 5-methylcytosine modification and its emerging role as an epitranscriptomic mark[J]. RNA Biology, 2021, 18(sup1): 117-127.

[192] LIU J, HUANG T, ZHANG Y, et al. Sequence- and structure-selective mRNA m(5)C methylation by NSUN6 in animals[J]. Natl Sci Rev, 2021, 8(6): nwaa273.

[193] SELMI T, HUSSAIN S, DIETMANN S, et al. Sequence- and structure-specific cytosine-5 mRNA methylation by NSUN6[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2021, 49(2): 1006-1022.

[194] SCHAEFER M, POLLEX T, HANNA K, et al. RNA methylation by Dnmt2 protects transfer RNAs against stress-induced cleavage[J]. Genes and Development, 2010, 24(15): 1590-1595.

[195] CAMARA Y, ASIN-CAYUELA J, PARK C B, et al. MTERF4 regulates translation by targeting the methyltransferase NSUN4 to the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome[J]. Cell Metab, 2011, 13(5): 527-539.

[196] SCHOSSERER M, MINOIS N, ANGERER T B, et al. Methylation of ribosomal RNA by NSUN5 is a conserved mechanism modulating organismal lifespan[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6: 6158.

[197] SHEN H, ONTIVEROS R J, OWENS M C, et al. TET-mediated 5-methylcytosine oxidation in tRNA promotes translation[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2021, 296: 100087.

[198] FANG L, WANG W, LI G, et al. CIGAR-seq, a CRISPR/Cas-based method for unbiased screening of novel mRNA modification regulators[J]. Molecular Systems Biology, 2020, 16(11): e10025.

[199] LEWIS S M, WILLIAMS A, EISENBARTH S C. Structure and function of the immune system in the spleen[J]. Sci Immunol, 2019, 4(33).

[200] MARSH B J, HOWELL K E. The mammalian Golgi--complex debates[J]. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2002, 3(10): 789-795.

[201] CARLTON J G, JONES H, EGGERT U S. Membrane and organelle dynamics during cell division[J]. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2020, 21(3): 151-166.

[202] SUAN D, SUNDLING C, BRINK R. Plasma cell and memory B cell differentiation from the germinal center[J]. Current Opinion in Immunology, 2017, 45: 97-10

Academic Degree Assessment Sub committee
生物系 ; 生物医学工程系
Domestic book classification number
Q55
Data Source
人工提交
Document TypeThesis
Identifierhttp://kc.sustech.edu.cn/handle/2SGJ60CL/515702
DepartmentDepartment of Biology
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
王雯. RNA修饰酶高通量筛选方法的建立及NSUN6的鉴定与功能研究[D]. 哈尔滨. 哈尔滨工业大学,2022.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
11749266-王雯-生物系.pdf(14838KB) Restricted Access--Fulltext Requests
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Export to Excel
Export to Csv
Altmetrics Score
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[王雯]'s Articles
Baidu Scholar
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[王雯]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[王雯]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.